Another Way Around the Credit Crisis - Minnesota Bill Authorizing Banks to "Monetize" Public Works

In August 2007, the nation was stunned by theand construction.
collapse of a major Minneapolis bridge, killing nine.The argument against this creative approach is
The bridge had been rated structurally deficientthat it would be inflationary, but would it? Inflation
by the U.S. government as far back as 1990, andresults when "demand" (money) increases faster
it was only one of more than 70,000 bridgesthan "supply" (goods and services); and in this
across the country with that rating. The Americancase goods and services would be increasing along
Society of Civil Engineers estimated that it wouldwith the money available to spend, keeping the
take nearly $190 billion to fix the country's failingmoney supply in balance and prices stable. In fact,
bridges over the next two decades. Minnesotait is the lending of money created out of thin air
and other states have the manpower and thethat is inflationary, because banks create the
materials to rebuild. What they lack is only theprincipal but not the interest necessary to pay
money to do it. Municipal governments have toback their loans. Additional loans must therefore
borrow money by issuing bonds, and the interestcontinually be taken out just to service the
they must pay on these bonds is going up."money" (or debt) that is already in the money
On March 13, 2008, Erik Sirri, director of the SEC'ssupply; and this newly-created money goes into
division of trading and markets, told Congress thatthe pockets of middlemen rather than contributing
the credit crisis has spread to municipal bondto the productivity of the community. "Demand"
auctions. "There is no question that the recent(money) thus goes up without a corresponding
dislocations in the municipal bond markets haveincrease in "supply," creating price inflation.
created unanticipated hardships for municipalThe solution to this conundrum is to authorize
issuers and in some cases dramatically increasedbanks to monetize the production of real goods
their borrowing costs," Sirri said. The inability ofand services, creating supply and demand at the
cities and states to sell municipal bonds tosame time. There is substantial precedent for this
investors at reasonable interest rates seriouslyapproach, stretching as far back as the early
threatens plans to build new roads, schools,American colonies:
airports and other public works projects.1* In the early eighteenth century, the colony of
Although the cost of borrowing is going up forPennsylvania issued money that was both lent and
municipal governments, this is not because theyspent by the local government into the economy,
are bad credit risks. In fact, they are extremelyproducing an unprecedented period of prosperity.
good credit risks. Creditors know where to findThis was done not only without producing price
them, and local governments have the power toinflation but without taxing the people.
tax to pay their bills. The problem lies with the* When Abraham Lincoln needed money to fund
bond insurers called "monolines," which havethe American Civil War, rather than paying 25 to
ventured into the very risky mortgage-backed36 percent interest charges, he avoided going into
securities market. This has put the insurers'debt by printing Greenback dollars that were "legal
triple-A ratings in jeopardy, along with the ratingstender" in themselves. Again, historians of the
of the municipal bonds they insure.period attest that this issue of Greenbacks was
While borrowing costs for municipal governmentsnot responsible for price inflation.
are skyrocketing, the interest rate the Federal* A successful infrastructure program funded with
Reserve charges to banks has been going down,interest-free "national credit" was instituted in New
even though banks are proving to be much riskierZealand after it elected its first Labor government
investments than local governments. The Federalin the 1930s. Credit issued by its nationalized
Reserve is a private banking corporation that iscentral bank allowed New Zealand to thrive at a
owned by other banks. It was established in 1913time when the rest of the world was struggling
to prevent bank runs and otherwise keep thewith poverty and lack of productivity.
banks from getting into trouble for* The island state of Guernsey, located in the
over-leveraging (lending out many times theirBritish Channel Islands, has been funding
assets), and that remains its principal functioninfrastructure with government-issued money for
today. The Federal Reserve recently extendedover 200 years, without creating price inflation
$200 billion in financing to 20 top investmentand without government debt.5 But Is It
banks at wholesale rates, but these low rates areConstitutional?
not being passed on to municipal governments orThese governments could create the money they
home buyers. The Federal Reserve is evidentlyneeded because they were sovereign entities, but
working for the banks more than for taxpayerswhat about individual States governed by a
or local governments.Thinking Outside the Box:federal Constitution? In the United States, the U.S.
The Minnesota Transportation ActConstitution controls. But that august document
Many people are getting tired of waiting for thesays very little about the creation of money - so
Federal Reserve and the federal government tolittle that banks have stepped in and taken over
act, and one of them is a Minnesota residentthe business by default. Here are the sole
named Byron Dale. Dale has drafted a bill calledConstitutional provisions directly addressing the
"the Minnesota Transportation Act" (MTA), whichcreation of money:
is scheduled for hearing before the Minnesota
Senate Transportation Committee on March 25,Article I, Section 8, Clause 5
2008. If adopted, the bill could represent a major: The Congress shall have Power...To coin Money,
innovation in the way state and local projects areregulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin,
funded. It would mandate Minnesota'sand fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.
Transportation Department and State-charteredArticle I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall...coin
banks to enter into an agreement providing thatMoney; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but
the banks would advance funds forgold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debt.
legislatively-approved transportation projects inCongress has been given the power to coin
the same way that banks make commercial loansmoney, but minting coins is not the same thing as
- simply by "monetizing" the projects themselves.issuing paper money, checkbook money,
Banks routinely monetize the promissory notes ofaccounting-entry money, or electronic money -
borrowers just by making book entries to athe forms of money used most often today.
checking account and saying "you have a newArguably, "to coin" money was an archaic way of
deposit with us." (More on this below.)saying "to create" money, but then what is to be
Under the MTA, the state-chartered banks wouldmade of the clause stating, "No state shall . . .
create a pass-through account titled an Assetmake any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender
Monetization Account (AMA), monetizing the bidin Payment of Debt"? "Coin" here clearly means
value of projects. This would be done in the sameprecious metal coins, period.
way that banks monetize collateral, except thatThat clause is interesting for another reason:
the deposit would go on the bank's books as anwhen was the last time you heard of a State
asset rather than a liability, turning the bid value ofpaying its debts in gold or silver coin? States
the project into "money" without debt. Thisroutinely pay their debts with the bank-created
money would be debited electronically out of theaccounting-entry money that now composes
AMA and credited to the State's Transportationover 97 percent of the U.S. money supply (M3),
Account (STA), from which it would then beand that form of money is omitted from the
debited out and credited in to the contractor'sConstitution altogether. The States therefore
bank account in a state bank, according to theviolate the Constitution every day, something
terms of the contract. The contractor wouldthey must do if they are to pay their debts at all,
spend this money to complete the project. Thesince gold and silver coins are no longer in general
money would flow into Minnesota's economy,circulation. The Constitution obviously needs to be
where it would provide for better, safer, moreamended to suit the times. Meanwhile, the Tenth
durable roads and bridges. It would be used toAmendment to the Constitution (part of the Bill of
purchase goods and services, benefiting business.Rights) provides:
It would go to pay taxes, helping the State
balance its budget. And it would flow back into theX - Rights of the States under Constitution
state-chartered banks as interest on outstanding: The powers not delegated to the United States
loans, reducing the number of loan defaults andby the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
improving the profits of the state-charteredStates, are reserved to the States respectively,
banks. In this way, says Dale, the MTA wouldor to the people.
benefit every segment of society.Too Radical?Creating checkbook money is not specifically
Maybe Not . . .delegated to the United States, so it must be
Dale says he has been proposing this sort ofdelegated to the States, unless it is specifically
state funding alternative for years; but only now,prohibited to them. What about the provision that
with the looming liquidity crisis, have legislators"No State shall . . . emit Bills of Credit"? According
begun to take him seriously. His plan may not beto "the 'Lectric Law Library," "bills of credit are
such a radical departure from existing practice asdeclared to mean promissory notes . . . . Bills of
it sounds. Commercial banks are already in thecredit may be defined to be paper issued and
business of creating money. Except for coins, ourintended to circulate through the community for
entire money supply is now created by banks inits ordinary purposes as money redeemable at a
the form of loans.2 Indeed, banks create all thefuture day." Bills of credit are promises to pay
money they lend. This was confirmed by thelater rather than what is being discussed here:
Chicago Federal Reserve in a booklet calledcheckbook money issued as "legal tender" - the
"Modern Money Mechanics," which states:sort of dollars banks issue every day when they
"Of course, [banks] do not really pay out loansmake commercial loans. The Constitution does not
from the money they receive as deposits. If theysay who is authorized to issue this sort of money
did this, no additional money would be created.- whether in paper, electronic or accounting-entry
What they do when they make loans is to acceptform - so under the Tenth Amendment, this right
promissory notes in exchange for credits to theis reserved to the States and to the People.
borrowers' transaction accounts. Loans (assets)As the credit crisis deepens and exposes the
and deposits (liabilities) both rise [by the sameinability of the existing banking structure to meet
amount]."3the public's needs, creative funding plans similar to
Many other authorities have confirmed thisthe proposed MTA could be popping up in
money-creating mechanism of commercial banks.4communities around the country. If the U.S.
State-chartered banks get their authority toCongress and the privately-owned Federal
create money from the State, and the State hasReserve will not issue the funds necessary for
the authority to determine the purpose for whichbridge and road repair and other urgent public
banks create money. State banks are nowprojects, we can encourage our State legislators
permitted to create money to monetize ato fill the breach; and if they won't do it, we the
mortgage or other promise to repay. They couldpeople can get together, apply for a bank charter,
as easily be authorized to "monetize" the promiseand create the funding ourselves. (See E. Brown,
of contractors to deliver labor and materials to"How to Start Your Own Bank,"
the State in the form of road and bridge repairwebofdebt.wordpress.com, February 23, 2008.