Interview: Richard Satterlie Author of Phoenix

ISBN: 1593745702like the issues (to me the themes) are secondary
The following interview with Richard Satterlie wasto the story, and if I did it right, they should
conducted by: NORM GOLDMAN: Editor ofsneak up on the reader. I'm hoping the readers
Today, Norm Goldman, Editor of is excited towill climb in the protagonist's skin and experience
have as our guest,Richard Satterlie, Ph.D,author ofthe themes rather than being assaulted by them.
Phoenix. Richard was Professor of Biology atNorm:
Arizona State University and he is now the FrankWhat challenges or obstacles did you encounter
Hawkins Kenan Distinguished Professor of Marinewhile writing your book? How did you overcome
Biology at the University of North Carolinathese challenges?
Wilmington.Richard:
Good day Richard and thanks for agreeing toThe primary obstacle was time. I have a
participate in our interview.wonderful, rewarding occupation, and I give it the
Norm:full attention it deserves. The way I've overcome
Where did you grow up and have reading andthis challenge--I don't sleep much. The second
writing always been a part of your life?obstacle is one all new authors face. Writing is
Richard:great fun for me, but I also want it to be just as
Thank you, Norm.much fun for the readers. There is constant
I was born and raised in Vallejo, California--aboutuncertainty about that one. The third challenge is
35 miles north of San Francisco, on San Pabloconvincing friends and family that writing is not
Bay. Way back then, I wanted to play basketballjust "another of those fly-by-night hobbies." Finally,
in the NBA, so reading wasn't high on my list.in historical fiction, it's very easy to slip
Same with writing. As my career plans changedcontemporary phrases into the dialogue, and to
(out of necessity), writing became more anduse period-inappropriate terms. Fortunately, my
more important. Due to the need for so muchwife is good at catching these things.
science-specific reading and writing, I didn't haveNorm:
much time to read fiction, and no time to write it.Can you explain some of your research
Eventually I found time, then I made time, but stilltechniques, and how you found sources for your
I don't read as much fiction as I'd like. I do mostbook?
of my writing at night, after the kids go to bed.Richard:
Norm:Research for Phoenix was fairly easy. The story
Why do you write and what inspired you to writestarts in Minnesota. My mother and father both
Phoenix?grew up in Minnesota, and some of my relatives
Richard:are still faming there. I learned about Norwegian
I guess the short answer to the first part of theways (good and bad) from my father. His father
question is I like intellectual challenges, and after sowas a first generation Norwegian-American like
much technical writing, fiction was a significantthe protagonist in Phoenix. The majority of the
challenge. Also, I like the idea of being able tostory takes place in the Arizona Territory. I lived
create situations, and build these situations intoin the Phoenix Valley for twenty-four years, and I
stories, all from my imagination. The wellspring forbecame familiar with the area and its history. The
Phoenix came from a book on the history of thereferences on Jack Swilling and his time period
Black Canyon area of Arizona, and the gold andwere extremely helpful.
silver mines that operated there for a time. WhatNorm:
allowed the wellspring to grow into a creek was aHow did you create Sievert Olafson in your book?
simple observation from that book. Stage andRichard:
wagon hold-up artists were being pinched by theThis is answered in the first part of my previous
development of railroads. But in the heyday ofanswer. One of my heroes was my father's
gold and silver mining in Black Canyon,brother, my Uncle Sid. Although he lived his life as
stagecoaches and wagons were still used to carrya very successful farmer in Minnesota, unlike
payrolls and ore. Any reasonable robber wouldSievert, his outlook on life and his personal values
migrate toward the easy marks, so this part ofmade an impression on me. My father held those
Arizona collected more than its fair share of badsame values, but you may know as well as I do
guys. What's interesting is this creek plays a verythat it's difficult to look at our own father and
minor role in the story, which speaks to howreally see him as a regular person.
fiction finds it own streambed.Norm:
Norm:What do you hope to achieve with your first
How long did it take you to write Phoenix andnovel and what do you hope readers will take
what did you learn from writing this book, as Iaway after reading the book? Is there an
believe this is your first work of fiction?underlying message in Phoenix?
Richard:Richard:
It took about six months to write it. I did writeI would like Phoenix to entertain its readers. There
one story before Phoenix, around 90,000 words,are a couple of underlying messages that, I hope,
but about 89,999 of those words were horrible. Icome across. Things like the importance of family,
didn't know how to write fiction, so I just told aand my favorite, developed in the book, about
story. Fortunately, I received an extremely harshhow our trajectory from birth to death is not a
evaluation of this work, which upped the challengestraight one, but meanders--sometimes to the
for me. With good advice and several books ongood and sometimes to the bad. But in the end, it
how to write fiction, Phoenix was my response.is the smoothed slope of the trajectory that is
Most of what I know about writing fiction cameimportant. Does it lean to the good or to the bad?
from working through Phoenix. I learned theI suspect different readers will take away
basics of the craft. I learned that the plot evolvesdifferent things from the book. Reading fiction is a
as the characters develop, and that this evolutionvery personal thing. If it is written correctly, the
shouldn't be resisted. I learned that I am stillreader will get so involved, his/her own
playing hide-and-seek with the subtleties of theexperience will flavor what they take away from
craft. And, I learned that this last part probably willit.
never change for any serious writer.Norm:
Norm:Up to now you have written non-fiction, how
How did you approach recreating the character ofeasy or difficult was it for you to write a work of
John William (Jack) Swilling who in fact was a realfiction?
person. Did you plan him out or did he evolve asRichard:
you wrote the book? Did you leave things outIt was fairly easy for me. Looking back, I have
that you had discovered about him?always dreamed in complete scenes. I can
Richard:remember playing with my small cars and building
I was fortunate to have three references thatsets, and I always had a story going, complete
gave a basic account of Jack Swilling's life, butwith interacting characters and dialogue. It's all in
they also presented slightly different versions ofthe imagination. I've always been able to do the
some of the more notorious aspects of hisimagination thing. Too much, sometimes.
personality. This allowed me to use the former asNorm:
guideposts for the story at the same time I couldHow much of Richard Satterlie is in the character
let my own extrapolations set the paths betweenof Sievert Olafson?
the guideposts. Since Swilling wasn't myRichard:
protagonist, but rather this new mentor, I felt IThere is very little of me in Sievert, although my
had more leeway in how I portrayed him. In realfamily may disagree. The one commonality I can
life, he was a rich personality. It was fun to playpoint to with certainty was a springboard for this
with that.story, though. When I decided to go to graduate
Norm:school, several family members tried to talk me
Do you agree, as Philip Gerard states in Writing aout of it. "What will you do with an advanced
Book that makes a Difference, that if you wantdegree in Biology?" was the question I remember
to write a good story or novel you need toto this day.
create struggles of powerful descriptive individualsNorm:
and not just issues. Through theirIs there anything else you'd like to share with us
accomplishments and travail, we very muchand what is next for Richard Satterlie?
comprehend the issues? If you do agree, how isRichard:
this applicable in Phoenix?I do have three other completed novels
Richard:(mystery, psychological suspense and supernatural
Absolutely. The best plot in the world isn't worthsuspense), and a fourth in progress (back to
much unless there are interesting, imperfectmystery). I'm also contemplating a sequel to
characters to act it out, in my opinion. A book ofPhoenix. Perhaps readers will help me decide if
fiction makes a horrible soapbox. But every goodSievert Olafson should come back to us.
book of fiction should whip up a few suds. It's theThanks once again and good luck with all of your
characters who do the whipping. Putting the issuesfuture endeavors.
above the characters exposes too much of theThank you for the great questions!
author, who should be invisible. In Phoenix, I feel