Minnesota Man Loses Appeal of State's DUI Implied Consent Law

Under Virginia's implied consent law, you arethose samples was illegal because the officials did
required to undergo a chemical test after beingnot obtain a warrant to do so. A district court
arrested for a Virginia DUI. A refusal of thisruled against Harrison, so he appealed the case to
request results in an automatic suspension of yourMinnesota appellate court.
driver's license for up to 1 year. But isn't thisThe Ruling
provision a violation of your constitutional rights?On May 4, 2010, the appeals court ruled that the
A similar issue was discussed in an appellate courtact of testing a blood sample which was obtained
decision in the state of Minnesota. In Harrison v.lawfully under the state's implied consent law did
Commissioner of Public Safety, the plaintiff arguednot constitute a search and therefore did not
that his Fourth Amendment rights protecting himaffect Harrison's constitutional rights.
from illegal search and seizure were violated.The court made the distinction between the
The Facts of the Caseacquisition of the blood sample and the
In 2009, Jesse Wayne Harrison was arrested onsubsequent testing process, noting that Harrison
two occasions for driving while intoxicated inhad no legitimate expectation of privacy regarding
Minnesota. In both instances, Harrison was askedthe actual blood alcohol content in his blood
to submit to chemical testing under Minnesota'ssample.
implied consent law. He gave his consent bothHiring a Virginia DUI Defense Lawyer
times.In the face of this tremendously stacked deck,
Subsequent testing of both blood samples foundyou get to pick one person to be on your side -
that Harrison was indeed legally drunk. As a result,your lawyer. This decision of who will be your
the state's commissioner for public safetylawyer will be one of the most important
revoked Harrison's driver's license.decisions you make in your life. We relish and
Harrison argued that even though he obeyed thethrive in the role of "going to battle" for the legal
implied consent law and gave a blood sample tounderdog.
law enforcement officials, the actual testing of