North Minneapolis 2009 – “40/40/40 Community Benefits Agreement” Must be a Part of Business as Usual to Help Community Growth

“If it’s not growing, it’s going toCBA. If enough stakeholders come together with
die.”a common vision for economic development,
…Michael Eisnerdevelopers are likely to want to negotiate an
In 2009 north Minneapolis community coalitionsagreement. The CBA process offers developers
need to implement a “40/40/40 Communityand attractive alternative to litigation and polarizing
Benefits Agreement” with any organizationpublic debates. (The University of Minnesota should
planning to develop, create or build in thehave been held to a more comprehensive CBA
community. A community benefits agreement, orthen the one NRRC has or is authoring).
CBA, is a private contract between a developerWith a comprehensive CBA (40/40/40), the
and a community coalition that sets forth theUniversity of Minnesota would have been severely
benefits that the community will receive from the“twisted” for pulling out of NorthPoint
development. Common benefits include livingHealth and Wellness Clinic and rather than FIPSE
wages, local hiring and training programs,(Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary
affordable housing, environmental remediation andEducation) waving $750,000.00 in funding
funds for community programs. CBAs ensure thatopportunities in the communities face, they would
development is equitable and benefits all membershave been required to develop (with community
of the community, eventually contributing toinput from people that have been successful in
stronger local economies, livable neighborhoodsbusiness and community engagement) a working
and increased public participation in the planningmodel that not only benefited the community and
process.FIPSE, but also “recaptured” funds that
The 40/40/40 CBA is structured to insure therewere originally invested in business, projects and
is a equal spread of 40% investment into thepeople. CBAs ensure that the developer’s
community before (development andpromises regarding community benefits are legally
construction), 40% during (employment ofenforceable. Developers like the University of
community residents) and 40% after (a set levelMinnesota - who are not really
of community engagement based on earned and“developers” – but scientists,
applied funding streams to benefit the communityanthropologists and administers hold the upper
in the form of grants and program support). Thishand when it comes to dollars they are
blanket agreement should be applied to agencies“pitching” for a project and often make
like the University of Minnesota, Metropolitanpromises that are never written into the
Transit, local banks and any developer or City ofdevelopment agreement, or are never enforced
Minneapolis coalition coming into north Minneapoliseven if they are included. This is especially true of
with a proposed projects.promises about jobs being created for local
For example, in New York City, “Communityresidents. CBAs commit developers in writing to
benefit,” of course, is a euphemism forpromises they make regarding their projects, and
“legal shakedown.” From a potentialmake enforcements much easier. Such
developer’s perspective, it represents aagreements generate a collaborative relationship
pre-negotiated bribe paid to politicians and theirfrom the beginning avoiding community objection
allies for the right to attempt to create new jobs,and costly delays.
and to bolster the city’s revenue base. ButIt’s not too late for a community coalition to
the practice is all the rage in New York thesecome together, author and deliver a detailed
days. Similar requirements accompanied theCommunity Benefit Agreement based on the 40
recent Harlem rezoning deal, and “community40/40 Rule that includes the community 100%.
benefit” shakedowns were integral to the newIn the calendar year 2009, a standard “40/40
Yankee and Shea baseball-stadium projects.40 Community Benefits Agreement” can and
The second part to implementing a successfulshould be delivered to anyone coming into north
CBA or “40/40/40 CBA” is the people atMinneapolis to do business. This is the only way
the community coalition level. Coalition-Building: Atthe residents of north Minneapolis will be able to
the heart of the community benefits strategy iscreate education options, build wealth and create
coalition building. Organizing and maintaining aeconomic stimuli while gaining independence by
coalition, facilitating compromise and crafting ahaving “choices.
shared agenda is essential to creating a successful