The Case of John Doe vs Biff Tannen and George McFly

Back to the Future has always been my favoriteSo which one pays first to an injured person?
movie. While I was watching it recently, anMinnesota law says that the insurance on the car
interesting auto insurance issue came up.is deemed "closest to the risk" so that will be the
Modern-day (that is, 1985) Biff Tannen, playedprimary insurance, while any insurance carried by
ably by Thomas F. Wilson, is George McFly'sthe driver will be available as excess coverage.
supervisor at work. George, as everyone knows,Biff would be a "permissive user" insured under
is the father of our hero, Marty McFly (Michael J.George's policy. If the injured person has a claim
Fox). Unfortunately for Marty, early in the movielarger than George's policy, Biff's policy would be
and right before his big weekend at the lake within place as excess insurance. If the injured person
Jennifer, Biff wrecks George's car.had proper Underinsured Motorist insurance (UIM)
As Marty enters his home, Biff and George arein place on their car, that policy would come in
having a heated exchange concerning the accident.last, after Biff's policy, to provide yet another
Biff insists the car had a blind spot. Georgelayer of insurance.
doesn't remember any blind spot but assumesThe levels of insurance coverage are in place not
that Biff's insurance will pay for the damages. Biffonly compensate injured people and to protect
points out, "It's your car! Your insurance shouldBiff, but also to protect George, the car's owner,
pay for it." Then Biff asserts that George shouldfrom vicarious liability. Vicarious liability imputes the
also pay his dry-cleaning bill because he spilled beernegligence of a borrower to the owner by
all over himself when that other car ran into him.statute. Under Minn. Stat. 170.54, when George
So I thought to myself, "That Biff. He is obviouslyallowed Biff to drive, Biff became George's agent
drinking and driving; he could have really hurtmaking George legally responsible for Biff's actions.
someone. What if he had?"So if Biff were uninsured, George could be held
In cases like this in Minnesota, George wouldresponsible for all of the damage. If Biff did
probably be upset to find out that Biff is right.enough harm, George could be personally liable for
George is legally responsible for Biff's negligence. Ifan innocent person's injuries even though he was
Biff would have hurt someone that fatefulmiles away from the accident.
evening, George's insurance would not only payThe moral of the story for George is that he
the injured person compensation before Biff'sshould know better than to let Biff drive his car,
insurance pays, but George would also be a likelyeven if Biff happens to be his supervisor and
defendant if Biff were ever sued.George isn't very good at confrontations. In light
Under Minnesota law, auto insurance covers bothof Biff's propensities to drink and drive, chase
cars and people. The insurance you buy isdown skateboarders in the middle of the street
available to protect you when you drive your ownand run into manure trucks, Biff is likely to get
car as well as when you drive other cars withGeorge mixed up in a big mess.
permission. That way you don't have to tell yourWhen you or someone you know is injured in a
insurance agent about it each time you usecar crash, it is important to sort out the
someone else's car or let someone use your car.ownership and insurance issues before settling a
So when someone borrows a car, a situation likeclaim. Make sure you speak to an experienced
this one with George and Biff arises, in that thereattorney regarding insurance coverage for your
are at least two policies covering the event.case.