| | | | | an age where the child's desires become an |
| As lawyers we are often asked when a child can | | | | "overwhelming consideration." However, most |
| decide where they will live. Often non-custodial | | | | courts appear to only give great weight to |
| parents count on being able to change custody | | | | children who are approaching the age of |
| when their children decide that they wish to live | | | | emancipation or, younger children, if their desires |
| with them. The short answer to the question is | | | | also lad to the possibility of conflict in the current |
| that, technically, children never have the final say | | | | custodial home or the thereat that the child m ay |
| with regard to custody. Instead, children who | | | | run away from that home. As some district |
| are deemed of suitable age and maturity by a | | | | court Judges have opined, at some age children |
| court to express a preference my do so, but | | | | may begin to vote with their feet. |
| their opinions are just one factor among many | | | | Ultimately, although a Court may give greater |
| that a court must consider. | | | | weight to the desires of an older child, that |
| However, case law has given some added | | | | preference is still not dispositive and the court |
| strength to the desires of children with regard | | | | must still analyze whether there has been a |
| to custody. In the Minnesota Court of Appeals | | | | threshold showing for a change of custody such |
| case Ross v. Ross, 477 N.W.2d 753 (Minn.App. | | | | as endangerment and whether the change of |
| 1991), the court states that the preference of an | | | | custody is in the child's best interests. It is also |
| "older teenage child" can be compelling. | | | | critical to note that such stated preferences of a |
| Specifically, the court stated that an older child's | | | | child will also be analyzed to determine if the |
| desires should be considered as an | | | | stated preference is the product of manipulation |
| "overwhelming consideration" with regard to | | | | by a non-custodial parent. |
| custody placements. The court does not specify | | | | |